Categories
Church Robert Haldane Theology

The Persuasive Use of Authority

Robert Haldane observed in his commentary on the twelfth chapter of Romans that Paul had a special way of using his authority.

When it comes to authority, we might have some assumptions about Paul. We would assume that Paul would only have a commanding tone in his speaking because he possessed the right of authority. We would expect that his syntax would be always in the imperative mood.

But Haldane observed that Paul didn’t use his authority that way. Paul said, “I beseech you” or “I appeal to you” (Rom 12:1). Haldane wrote:

Those whose authority was avouched by mighty signs and wonders, whose very word was command, strive frequently to express commands as entreaties.

Commentary, 566.

Haldane’s observation is that the apostles were not insecure about their authority, even though their authority had been clearly demonstrated. Yet the apostles could choose to entreat people and appeal to them by way of persuasion, rather than command. They didn’t need to be defensive. They had the liberty to persuade when they had the right to command.

This observation is helpful for pastors to know. Often, according to the authority of God’s word, there is the need to exercise authority and make commands (as Scripture requires). At the same time, the aim of persuading by entreating ought to be the norm.

This is where the pastoral requirement of gentleness comes to the forefront (Ti 3:2). Gentleness is persuading, entreating and compassionate, even when the right to command exists.

Paul would nevertheless urge Timothy, “Command and teach these things” (1 Timothy 4:11). These leaders had the right to command and exercised that right. But when they had the opportunity, they would “express commands as entreaties”.

Categories
History Robert Haldane

Robert Haldane on The Fate of Those Who Have Never Heard the Gospel

The perennial question of the fate of those who have never heard the gospel is addressed by Robert Haldane.

While it is on all hands admitted that the knowledge of the gospel is highly beneficial, there are many who may hold that it is not indispensable to salvation. This opinion is opposed to the whole testimony of the Scriptures, whether they refer to the way of salvation, or to the condition of all who are strangers to the gospel. From every part of the word of God, it is obvious that salvation comes to none of the human race in any other way than through the knowledge, more or less clear, of the Messiah, before or after his advent. “Neither is there salvation in any other for there is none other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved.” [Acts 4:12] Multitudes, however, are unwilling to admit that salvation should be so limited in its extent as to be confined to those who have enjoyed the advantage of a revelation with respect to the Messiah. They have, therefore, endeavored to show that the benefits of Christ’s death may be available to those whom they term the virtuous in all nations, even although they have heard nothing of the revelation of mercy (emphasis mine).

From Exposition of Epistle to the Romans (1858), 670.